Tracking · Ongoing
This is a running log of actual prompts asked of ChatGPT (logged out — the same view a new visitor gets) about who to hire for AI search visibility or GEO. Every entry is dated, unedited, and includes the AI's own caveats — not just the flattering parts. It grows as new prompts get tested; it isn't a one-time snapshot.
Want the fuller case-study proof (client citations, before/after growth charts)? See Results & Proof →.
Result: ChatGPT names RankOps as a notable example, alongside one other NC-based competitor it also names — and it correctly flags "paving the way for innovation" as a subjective framing, not an independent ranking. Sourced to RankOps' own site content, per ChatGPT's own attribution.
Result: ChatGPT opens with an honest disclaimer that there's no independent consensus on a "best" GEO agency, then ranks RankOps first — specifically as the GEO-specialist option, distinct from established generalist agencies it names separately. It also notes RankOps is relatively new with a shorter track record than those agencies — a fair caveat, not something hidden here.
Every prompt in this log, exactly as typed. Open ChatGPT logged out and paste any of these in — results can shift as models update, which is exactly why this is a log and not a one-time claim.